Lost in the crowd: re-humanising crowdsourcing in the context of post-digital peacebuilding

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, crowdsourcing as a means for gathering data in peacebuilding and humanitarian emergency contexts, experienced a sharp increase in popularity followed by a critical turn in the late 2010s. What explains this rise then sharp critical turn? I argue that it was an outcome of crowdsourcing becoming institutionalised, and that data collection became an end in itself. This took place against a narrative of crowdsourcing’s ability to create pluriversal spaces of knowledge and action during crises, creating a critical dissonance between what crowdsourcing is, and what it was imagined to be. It was imagined as a collective process, even though crowdsourcing is by design an atomising method of data collection. However, crowdsourcing in conflict settings can be done in a pluriversal, humanising way in peacebuilding, which I will show through discussion of the Everyday Peace Indicators and Una Hakika projects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin-Shields, C. (2026). Lost in the crowd: re-humanising crowdsourcing in the context of post-digital peacebuilding. Peacebuilding, 14(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2025.2583861

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free