Correlation between dental amalgam fillings and urinary mercury levels in the Jordanian population: A comparative population-based study

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background/purpose: The health risks of mercury-containing dental amalgam fillings remain controversial. Urinary mercury levels are used as a tool to assess mercury exposure toxicity. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effects of dental amalgam fillings on urinary mercury levels in the Jordanian population. Materials and methods: This study recruited an experimental group of 108 participants with dental amalgam fillings and control group of 109 participants without dental amalgam fillings. Urinary mercury levels were measured and compared between the two groups. Results: The results showed a statistically significant increase in urinary mercury concentration in participants with dental amalgam fillings compared to participants with no dental amalgam fillings (6.42 ± 0.37 μg/L vs 1.55 ± 0.05 μg/L, P < 0.05). It also showed that this increase in urinary mercury levels among Jordanians with dental amalgam fillings was statistically significant when individuals had more than 6 dental amalgam fillings (9.36 ± 1.68 μg/L) compared to those with fewer than 6 (4.73 ± 0.34 μg/L, P < 0.05). Increased urinary mercury levels among Jordanians were also correlated with having dental amalgam fillings for more than 10 years. Conclusion: Increased urinary mercury levels in the Jordanian population are correlated with both the number of amalgam fillings and the duration of having these fillings. However, this increase in urinary mercury levels observed in this study is below the threshold that would pose significant health risks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Odat, I., Al-Fawaeir, S., & Odat, N. (2026). Correlation between dental amalgam fillings and urinary mercury levels in the Jordanian population: A comparative population-based study. Journal of Dental Sciences, 21(1), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2025.05.022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free