The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges

  • Van Calster B
  • van Smeden M
  • van Amsterdam W
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The current status of applied clinical prediction modeling is poor. Many models are developed with suboptimal methods and are not evaluated, and hence have little impact on clinical care. We review 12 challenges—provocatively labeled enemies—that jeopardize the creation of prediction models that make it to clinical practice to improve treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for individual patients. The challenges cover four areas: context, data, design and analysis, and scientific culture. We provide negative examples and recommendations for improvement, but also highlight positive examples and developments. Greater awareness of the complexities surrounding clinical prediction modeling is needed among researchers, funding agencies, health professionals as end users, and all of us as potential patients. To improve the utility of prediction models for healthcare and society, we need fewer but better models as well as more resources for model validation, impact assessment, and implementation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Calster, B., van Smeden, M., van Amsterdam, W., Coemans, M., Wynants, L., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2025). The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-123749

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free