Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Implant-Supported Three-Unit Metal Frameworks Fabricated by the Conventional, Semi-Digital, and Fully Digital Techniques Before and After Porcelain Application

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Only a small number of studies conducted on implant-supported fixed multi-unit restorations have evaluated the semi-digital fabrication techniques. This study aimed to assess the marginal and internal adaptation of implant-supported three-unit metal frameworks fabricated by the conventional, semi-digital, and fully digital techniques before and after porcelain application. Material and Methods: In this in vitro study, 120 three-unit metal frameworks were fabricated by five different techniques (n = 20): fabrication of metal frameworks from hard metal by the milling technique, direct 3D-printing of metal, milling of resin pattern and subsequent casting, 3D-printing of resin pattern and subsequent casting, and conventional waxing and subsequent casting. The marginal and internal adaptation of the frameworks was evaluated before and after porcelain application by using the silicone replica technique. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons with the Games-Howell and paired samples tests (α = 0.05). Results: Before porcelain application, resin pattern milling, and subsequent casting resulted in the smallest marginal gap, while hard metal milling yielded the largest marginal gap. The fully digital techniques yielded the largest cuspal and fossa gaps, while the conventional method yielded the largest axial gap. After porcelain application, metal 3D-printing and conventional casting resulted in comparable (p = 0.109) marginal gaps, smaller than hard metal milling (p < 0.001). The conventional casting method yielded the smallest cuspal and fossa gaps (p < 0.001). Porcelain application significantly increased the gap size at all measurement points (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The fabrication technique significantly affected the marginal and internal adaptation of implant-supported three-unit metal frameworks both before and after porcelain application.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karimi, M., Neshandar Asli, H., Hamrah, Y., Ghaffari, M. E., & Falahchai, M. (2025). Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Implant-Supported Three-Unit Metal Frameworks Fabricated by the Conventional, Semi-Digital, and Fully Digital Techniques Before and After Porcelain Application. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free