Secondary Prophylaxis Among First Nations People With Acute Rheumatic Fever in Australia: An Integrative Review

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) among Australia’s First Nations populations are some of the highest in the world, accounting for 95% of the 2,244 ARF notifications between 2015 and 2019 in Australia. A key issue in treating ARF is long-term secondary prophylaxis, yet only one in five patients received treatment in 2019. This review identifies barriers to secondary prophylaxis of ARF in Australia’s First Nations people. Methods: An integrative review was undertaken utilizing PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Wiley Online. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used, followed by thematic analysis. Results: The key themes uncovered included: issues with database and recall systems, patient/family characteristics, service delivery location and site, pain of injection, education (including language barriers), and patient-clinician relationship. Conclusions: A national RHD register, change in operation model, improved pain management, improved education, and need for consistent personnel is suggested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Govender, K., & Müller, A. (2023, November 1). Secondary Prophylaxis Among First Nations People With Acute Rheumatic Fever in Australia: An Integrative Review. Journal of Transcultural Nursing. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/10436596231191248

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free