USING DIRECT QUESTIONING TO VALUE THE EXISTENCE BENEFITS OF PRESERVED NATURAL AREAS

25Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A major limitation to the effectiveness of benefit‐cost analyses of proposals involving natural ecosystems is the assertion of existence demand. Not only has confusion arisen regarding its exact definition but little has been done to establish its magnitude. Existence benefits are defined and an empirical study of the value a sample of Canberra residents places on the continued provision of the existence benefits of a particular ecosystem, Nadgee Nature Reserve, is outlined. It is concluded that while the measurement technique employed, the direct questioning of respondents, may be subject to a problem of response bias, it is capable of providing a reasonable estimate of these existence benefits. The average existence value per Canberra adult is at least $20, that is $2 per annum in perpetuity given a 10 per cent real interest rate. 1984 The Australian Agricultural Economics Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bennett, J. W. (1984). USING DIRECT QUESTIONING TO VALUE THE EXISTENCE BENEFITS OF PRESERVED NATURAL AREAS. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 28(2–3), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1984.tb00644.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free