Abstract
A key obstacle to developing a satisfying theory of galaxy evolution is the difficulty in extending analytic descriptions of early structure formation into full non-linearity, the regime in which galaxy growth occurs. Extant techniques, though powerful, are based on approximate numerical methods whose Monte Carlo-like nature hinders intuition building. Here, we develop a new solution to this problem and its empirical validation. We first derive closed-form analytic expectations for the evolution of fixed percentiles in the real-space cosmic density distribution, averaged over representative volumes observers can track cross-sectionally. Using the Lagrangian forms of the fluid equations, we show that percentiles in δ - the density relative to the median - should grow as δ(t) ∝ δ0α tβ, where α ≡ 2 and β ≡ 2 for Newtonian gravity at epochs after the overdensities transitioned to non-linear growth. We then use 9.5 square degress of Carnegie-Spitzer-IMACS Redshift Survey data to map galaxy environmental densities over 0.2 < z < 1.5 (∼7 Gyr) and infer α = 1.98 ± 0.04 and β = 2.01 ± 0.11 - consistent with our analytic prediction. These findings - enabled by swapping the Eulerian domain of most work on density growth for a Lagrangian approach to real-space volumetric averages - provide some of the strongest evidence that a lognormal distribution of early density fluctuations indeed decoupled from cosmic expansion to grow through gravitational accretion. They also comprise the first exact, analytic description of the non-linear growth of structure extensible to (arbitrarily) low redshift. We hope these results open the door to new modelling of, and insight-building into, galaxy growth and its diversity in cosmological contexts.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kelson, D. D., Abramson, L. E., Benson, A. J., Patel, S. G., Shectman, S. A., Dressler, A., … Williams, R. J. (2020). Gravity and the non-linear growth of structure in the Carnegie-Spitzer-IMACS Redshift Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494(2), 2628–2640. https://doi.org/10.1093/MNRAS/STAA100
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.