Comparison of conventional and reversed phage typing procedures for identification of Listeria spp.

15Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Of 225 Listeria isolates evaluated, 199 had the same bacteriophage patterns by both the conventional (A. Audurier, A. G. Taylor, B. Carbonelle, and J. McLaughlin, Clin. Invest. Med. 7:229-232, 1984) and the new, easier to apply, 'reversed' (M. J. Loessner, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:882-884, 1991) phage typing procedures, 5 had different phage reactions, and the remaining 21 isolates were untypeable. Thus, the overall typeability rate was 90.7%, and 97.6% of the typeable isolates had the same phage patterns by both procedures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Estela, L. A., & Sofos, J. N. (1993). Comparison of conventional and reversed phage typing procedures for identification of Listeria spp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.59.2.617-619.1993

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free