Density-equalizing mapping and scientometric benchmarking in industrial health

16Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Bibliometric techniques have been introduced to the field of industrial health in the past two decades. Since then, several studies have assessed progression of science in this area using quantitative measures and qualitative measures such as impact factor or H-indices. Since novel procedures such as density-equalizing mapping have not been used so far, the present study combined classical bibliometric tools with novel scientometric and visualizing techniques. All "INDUSTRIAL HEALTH" entries listed in the ISI database since 1987 were screened and analyzed. Using bibliometric approaches, a continuous increase in qualitative markers such as collaboration numbers or citations were found while quantity markers such as author numbers or publication numbers remained relatively constant. The combination with density equalizing mapping revealed a distinct global pattern of research productivity and citation activity with Japanese institutions at the leading position. Radar chart techniques were used to visualize bi- and multilateral research cooperations and institutional cooperations. In summary, the present study supplies a first scientometric-bibliometric approach that visualizes research activity in "INDUSTRIAL HEALTH" over the past decades.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scutaru, C., Quarcoo, D., Takemura, M., Welte, T., Fischer, T. C., & Groneberg-Kloft, B. (2010). Density-equalizing mapping and scientometric benchmarking in industrial health. Industrial Health, 48(2), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.48.197

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free