Management of peptic ulcer bleeding in different case volume workplaces: Results of a nationwide inquiry in hungary

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a national survey to evaluate the recent endoscopic treatment and drug therapy of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) patients and to compare practices in high and low case volume Hungarian workplaces. A total of 62 gastroenterology units participated in the six-month study. A total of 3033 PUB cases and a mean of 8.15 ± 3.9 PUB cases per month per unit were reported. In the 23 high case volume units (HCV), there was a mean of 12.9 ± 5.4 PUB cases/month, whereas in the 39 low case volume units (LCV), a mean of 5.3 ± 2.9 PUB cases/month were treated during the study period. In HCV units, endoscopic therapies for Forrest Ia, Ib, and IIa ulcers were significantly more often used than in LCV units (86 versus 68; P = 0.001). Among patients with stigmata of recent haemorrhage (Forrest I, II), bolus + continuous infusion PPI was given significantly more frequently in HCV than in LCV units (49.6 versus 33.2; P = 0.001). Mortality in HCV units was less than in LCV units (2.7 versus 4.3; P = 0.023). The penetration of evidence-based recommendations for PUB management is stronger in HCV units resulting lower mortality. © 2012 István Rácz et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rácz, I., Kárász, T., Lukács, K., Rácz, F., Kersák, J., Wacha, J., … Altorjay, I. (2012). Management of peptic ulcer bleeding in different case volume workplaces: Results of a nationwide inquiry in hungary. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/956434

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free