A COMPARISON OF RESPONSE PATTERNS ON FIXED‐, VARIABLE‐, AND RANDOM‐RATIO SCHEDULES

  • Crossman E
  • Bonem E
  • Phelps B
18Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The behavior of individual pigeons on fixed‐ratio, variable‐ratio, and random‐ratio schedules was examined. Within each type of ratio schedule the size of the ratio was varied in an irregular sequence. At various ratio sizes (5, 10, 40, 80) no differences were found among overall response rates (post‐reinforcement pause plus running response rate) as a function of ratio type. This similarity in overall response rates held despite noticeable differences in the microstructure of performance both within and across subjects; the primary performance difference on the three types of ratio schedules was the relatively longer postreinforcement pause duration on the fixed‐ratio schedule. We concluded that the gross temporal characteristics of performance determined by the relative weightings of the postreinforcement pause and running response rate were primarily controlled by the type of ratio schedule (fixed, variable, or random), whereas the overall rate of responding was controlled by the size of the ratio.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crossman, E. K., Bonem, E. J., & Phelps, B. J. (1987). A COMPARISON OF RESPONSE PATTERNS ON FIXED‐, VARIABLE‐, AND RANDOM‐RATIO SCHEDULES. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1987.48-395

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free