A comparative analysis of high-throughput platforms for validation of a circulating microRNA signature in diabetic retinopathy

60Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

MicroRNAs are now increasingly recognized as biomarkers of disease progression. Several quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) platforms have been developed to determine the relative levels of microRNAs in biological fluids. We systematically compared the detection of cellular and circulating microRNA using a standard 96-well platform, a high-content microfluidics platform and two ultra-high content platforms. We used extensive analytical tools to compute inter- and intra-run variability and concordance measured using fidelity scoring, coefficient of variation and cluster analysis. We carried out unprejudiced next generation sequencing to identify a microRNA signature for Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) and systematically assessed the validation of this signature on clinical samples using each of the above four qPCR platforms. The results indicate that sensitivity to measure low copy number microRNAs is inversely related to qPCR reaction volume and that the choice of platform for microRNA biomarker validation should be made based on the abundance of miRNAs of interest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farr, R. J., Januszewski, A. S., Joglekar, M. V., Liang, H., McAulley, A. K., Hewitt, A. W., … Hardikar, A. A. (2015). A comparative analysis of high-throughput platforms for validation of a circulating microRNA signature in diabetic retinopathy. Scientific Reports, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10375

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free