The Clinical Trials Directive: How Is It Affecting Europe's Noncommercial Research

  • Hartmann M
  • Hartmann-Vareilles F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cooperative research in fisheries science and management is increasing throughout the United States, in part because of the increasing trust and credibility divide between fish-ermen and scientists. For example, the Northeast Consortium was established to, among other goals, help bring fishermen's information, experience, and expertise into the scien-tific framework needed for fisheries management. This research begins to examine whether cooperative research integrates fishermen's and scientists' knowledge, particu-larly among highly engaged industry leaders and their science partners. Findings are presented from three surveys—individuals engaged in commercial fishing in northern New England (n ¼ 295), and fishermen (n ¼ 60), and scientists (n ¼ 37) participating in Northeast Consortium projects—examining: (1) whether knowledge integration was considered important and achievable, and why; and (2) whether and how fishermen and scientists learned about the scientific process or fishermen and fishing, respectively, from participating in cooperative research. Ramifications of the study and recommendations for research program managers are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hartmann, M., & Hartmann-Vareilles, F. (2006). The Clinical Trials Directive: How Is It Affecting Europe’s Noncommercial Research. PLoS Clinical Trials, 1(2), e13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free