Risk-Prediction Models for Clinical Decision-Making in Sarcoma Care: An International Survey Among Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Clinicians

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Risk prediction models (RPMs) are statistical tools that predict outcomes on the basis of clinical characteristics and can thereby support (shared) decision-making. With the shift toward personalized medicine, the number of RPMs has increased exponentially, including in multimodal sarcoma care. However, their integration into routine soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) care remains largely unknown. Therefore, we inventoried RPM use in sarcoma care during tumor board discussions and patient consultations as well as the attitudes toward the use of RPMs to support (shared) decision-making among STS clinicians. Materials and Methods: A 29-item survey was disseminated online to members of international sarcoma societies. Results: This study enrolled 278 respondents. Respectively, 68% and 65% of the clinicians reported using RPMs during tumor board discussions and/or patient consultations. During tumor board discussions, RPMs were used primarily to assess the potential benefits of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. During patient consultations, RPMs were used to predict patient prognosis upon request and to assist in decision-making regarding (neo)adjuvant therapies. The reliability of patient risk predicted by RPMs and the absence of guidelines regarding the use of RPMs were identified as barriers. Additionally, some clinicians questioned the applicability of estimates from RPMs to individual patients and expressed concerns about causing unnecessary anxiety when discussing prognostic outcomes. Conclusions: Responding STS clinicians frequently use RPMs to support decision-making about (neo)adjuvant therapies. However, they expressed concerns about the applicability of RPM estimates to individual patients and reported challenges in communicating prognostic outcomes with patients. These findings highlight the difficulties clinicians face when integrating RPMs into patient consultations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kruiswijk, A. A., Vlug, L. A. E., Acem, I., Engelhardt, E. G., Gronchi, A., Callegaro, D., … van Bodegom-Vos, L. (2025). Risk-Prediction Models for Clinical Decision-Making in Sarcoma Care: An International Survey Among Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Clinicians. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 32(4), 2958–2970. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16849-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free