Updating purpose limitation for AI: a normative approach from law and philosophy

12Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose limitation principle goes beyond the protection of the individual data subjects: it aims to ensure transparency, fairness and its exception for privileged purposes. However, in the current reality of powerful AI models, purpose limitation is often impossible to enforce and is thus structurally undermined. This paper addresses a critical regulatory gap in EU digital legislation: the risk of secondary use of trained models and anonymised training datasets. Anonymised training data, as well as AI models trained from this data, pose the threat of being freely reused in potentially harmful contexts such as insurance risk scoring and automated job applicant screening. We propose shifting the focus of purpose limitation from data processing to AI model regulation. This approach mandates that those training AI models define the intended purpose and restrict the use of the model solely to this stated purpose.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mühlhoff, R., & Ruschemeier, H. (2025). Updating purpose limitation for AI: a normative approach from law and philosophy. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free