Reality or Illusion? The Efficacy of Non-market Strategy in Institutional Risk Reduction

96Citations
Citations of this article
139Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Non-market strategy researchers have postulated that political and social strategies reduce the exposure of firms to risk, but those arguments have received little empirical attention. In this paper, we integrate social capital and institutional theories to examine the efficacy of managerial political ties (MPTs) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in institutional risk reduction. Using survey data from 179 firms in Ghana we find that, whereas CSR reduces institutional risk exposure, MPTs do not. We also find that the effect of MPTs on risk exposure is moderated by public affairs functions. Contrary to extant literature, we do not find evidence of complementarity between MPTs and CSR. Altogether, the findings not only show that the proposed efficacy of MPTs in risk reduction is illusive, but they also signal the need for scrutinizing the harmony between non-market political and social strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liedong, T. A., Rajwani, T., & Mellahi, K. (2017). Reality or Illusion? The Efficacy of Non-market Strategy in Institutional Risk Reduction. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12229

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free