A Public Option in Banking: Postal Banking

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There are many services and utilities that would benefit from a public option because markets are either monopolized or failing. Whatever the merits of the public option in other fields, the banking system is undemocratic without a public option. This is because most basic banking services – deposit-taking, financial transactions, lending – operate using a federal government platform, network, or guarantee. Federal government support is not a mere subsidy because the federal infrastructure does not simply enhance bank profits, but it makes the entire modern banking enterprise possible. In other words, this framework not only enhances, but enables modern banking markets. Most of this support, like FDIC insurance, is invisible to the average consumer and usually unnecessary whole some of this support is implicit and rare like the bank bailouts. All of it is meant to induce public trust and participation in the banking sector. Scholars have called banks “a franchise” and courts have called them “instrumentalities” of the federal government. Banks are granted a charter to operate by the federal government, which allows them to “plug in” to the government payments and credit structure. Thus, the hidden monopoly power in the banking sector is the federal government, making it essential to provide access to all.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baradaran, M. (2021). A Public Option in Banking: Postal Banking. In Politics, Policy, and Public Options (pp. 153–174). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108767552.010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free