Erratum: Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis [Phys. Rev. E 80 , 056117 (2009)]

  • Lancichinetti A
  • Fortunato S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Uncovering the community structure exhibited by real networks is a crucial step toward an understanding of complex systems that goes beyond the local organization of their constituents. Many algorithms have been proposed so far, but none of them has been subjected to strict tests to evaluate their performance. Most of the sporadic tests performed so far involved small networks with known community structure and/or artificial graphs with a simplified structure, which is very uncommon in real systems. Here we test several methods against a recently introduced class of benchmark graphs, with heterogeneous distributions of degree and community size. The methods are also tested against the benchmark by Girvan and Newman [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 7821 (2002)] and on random graphs. As a result of our analysis, three recent algorithms introduced by Rosvall and Bergstrom [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 7327 (2007); Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 1118 (2008)], Blondel et al. [J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2008), P10008], and Ronhovde and Nussinov [Phys. Rev. E 80, 016109 (2009)] have an excellent performance, with the additional advantage of low computational complexity, which enables one to analyze large systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lancichinetti, A., & Fortunato, S. (2014). Erratum: Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis [Phys. Rev. E 80 , 056117 (2009)]. Physical Review E, 89(4). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.89.049902

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free