A pivotal registration phase III, multicenter, randomized tuberculosis controlled trial: Design issues and lessons learnt from the Gatifloxacin for TB (OFLOTUB) project

30Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This artice is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There have been no major advances in tuberculosis (TB) drug development since the first East African/British Medical Research Council short course chemotherapy trial 35 years ago. Since then, the landscape for conducting TB clinical trials has profoundly changed with the emergence of HIV infection, the spread of resistant TB bacilli strains, recent advances in mycobacteriological capacity, and drug discovery. As a consequence questions have arisen on the most appropriate approach to design and conduct current TB trials. To highlight key issues discussed: Is a superiority, equivalence, or non-inferiority design most appropriate? What should be the primary efficacy outcome? How to consider re-infections in the definition of the outcome? What is the optimal length of patient follow-up? Is blinding appropriate when treatment duration in test arm is shorter? What are the appropriate assumptions for sample size calculation?Methods: Various drugs are currently in the development pipeline. We are presenting in this paper the design of the most recently completed phase III TB trial, the OFLOTUB project, which is the pivotal trial of a registration portfolio for a gatifloxacin-containing TB regimen. It is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled trial aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a gatifloxacin-containing 4-month regimen (trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov database: NCT00216385).Results: In the light of the recent scientific and regulatory discussions, we discuss some of the design issues in TB clinical trials and more specifically the reasons that guided our choices, in order to best answer the trial objectives, while at the same time satisfying regulatory authority requirements.Conclusion: When shortening TB treatment, we are advocating for a non-inferiority, non-blinded design, with a composite unfavorable endpoint assessed 12 months post treatment completion, and added trial procedures specifically aiming to: (1) minimize endpoint unavailability; and (2) distinguish between relapse and re-infection. © 2012 Merle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merle, C. S. C., Sismanidis, C., Sow, O. B., Gninafon, M., Horton, J., Lapujade, O., … Fielding, K. (2012). A pivotal registration phase III, multicenter, randomized tuberculosis controlled trial: Design issues and lessons learnt from the Gatifloxacin for TB (OFLOTUB) project. Trials, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-61

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free