18F-FDG PET in Myocardial Viability Assessment: A Practical and Time-Efficient Protocol

15Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We assessed image quality using a practical and time-efficient protocol for intravenous glucose loading and insulin injection before administration of 18F-FDG for PET myocardial viability evaluation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: The metabolic preparation period (MPP) or optimal cardiac 18F-FDG uptake was determined from the time of intravenous infusion of 12.5 or 25 g of 50% dextrose to the time of 18F-FDG injection. Cardiac 18F-FDG image quality was evaluated according to a 5-point scoring system (from 5, excellent, to 1, nondiagnostic) by 2 independent observers. In cases of disagreement, consensus was achieved in a joint reading. Fifteen patients with ICM who underwent oral glucose loading and intravenous insulin administration served as a reference for MPP comparisons. Results: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (age, 63 6 10 y; 48 men and 11 women) underwent rest 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of myocardial viability. 18F-FDG image quality was scored as excellent in 42%, very good in 36%, good in 17%, fair in 3%, and nondiagnostic in 2%. When diabetic and nondiabetic patients were compared, the quality scores were excellent in 29% versus 76%, very good in 41% versus 18%, good in 24% versus 6%, fair in 4% versus 0%, and nondiagnostic in 2% versus 0%. The mean (6SD) quality score was 4.12 6 0.95, and overall it was better in nondiabetic than in diabetic patients (4.71 6 0.59 vs. 3.88 6 0.96; P, 0.0001). Notably, the average MPP was significantly less with intravenous glucose loading than with oral glucose loading (51 6 15 min vs. 132 6 29 min; P, 0.0001), paralleled by higher insulin doses (6.3 6 2.2 U vs. 2.0 6 1.69 U; P, 0.001). Conclusion: Using a practical and time-efficient protocol for intravenous glucose loading and insulin administration before 18F-FDG injection reduces the MPP by 61% as compared with an oral glucose challenge and affords good-to-excellent image quality in 95% of ICM patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mhlanga, J., Derenoncourt, P., Haq, A., Bhandiwad, A., Laforest, R., Siegel, B. A., … Schindler, T. H. (2022). 18F-FDG PET in Myocardial Viability Assessment: A Practical and Time-Efficient Protocol. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 63(4), 602–608. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262432

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free