Psychometric Testing and Clinical Utility of a Modified Version of the Function in Sitting Test for Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

18Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: Seated balance (SB) is substantially compromised and greatly impacts the function of individuals living with a spinal cord injury (SCI). A clinically applicable criterion standard measure for SB does not exist for this population. Initial validation and reliability analysis of the Function in Sitting Test (FIST) in SCI has been published, but the authors of this study report that modifications to the tool may be necessary. This study aimed to explore the psychometrics and clinical utility of a modified version of the FIST to better measure SCI-specific functional tasks in sitting. Design: The FIST was modified (FIST-SCI) by an expert panel and used by 2 graders to evaluate the SB of individuals with chronic SCI (cSCI) on 2 separate days. The Motor Assessment Scale item 3 (MAS-SCI) was included as a comparison measure. Setting: Research facility. Participants: Individuals with cSCI longer than 1 year (N=38) participated in the study. Injury levels of individuals participating in this study spanned C1 to T10 (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A, 17 subjects; B, 12 subjects; and C, 9 subjects). Thirteen individuals required assistance to transfer. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Validity, reliability, internal consistency, sensitivity, specificity, and responsiveness. Results: Validity testing found a moderate relationship between the MAS-SCI and the FIST-SCI (ρ,. 522; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palermo, A. E., Cahalin, L. P., Garcia, K. L., & Nash, M. S. (2020). Psychometric Testing and Clinical Utility of a Modified Version of the Function in Sitting Test for Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. In Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 101, pp. 1961–1972). W.B. Saunders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free