Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: A tool for peer reviewers

3Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To present some criteria, many of which were created in the form of a checklist of items to be considered throughout the review process. Furthermore, we present a study whose main objective was to build (and validate) a review instrument by specialists that is clear, comprehensive, concise and consistent with the highest standards of excellence. Method: We use a survey to collect data (123 answers). To analyze the open answers we use the technique of content analysis through the Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Results: Besides the creation of new criteria with a focus on methodological dimensions based on 12 items, the involvement of the Ibero-American Congress on Qualitative Research scientific committee in the validation of this instrument. Conclusion: This option, in line with the others described, will allow to implement improvements to the editions of the events using the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool in 2018.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Costa, A. P., & Minayo, M. C. de S. (2019). Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: A tool for peer reviewers. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem, 53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2018041403448

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free