Comparative Study between Wearable Sensor and Cuff Arm Blood Pressure Meter in Measuring Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Monitor Using Statistical Approach

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Heart rate and blood pressure monitoring during physical activity and exercise allow early diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and obesity. Plethysmography(PPG) has become popular worldwide for personal health monitoring systems. However, the accuracy of this technology in monitoring heart rate and blood pressure during activity is poorer than at rest. It limits their application. In this study, the performance of the wearable sensor and arm cuff blood pressure meter in measuring heart rate and blood pressure on the left arm is compared. Five healthy volunteers conducted the same exercise protocols, i.e., at rest, jump rope, treadmill walking, running (long run) and sprinting (short-run). The wearable sensor shows a mean absolute percentage error in 6.08% and Pearson coefficient in 0.61. Besides, the lowest range of 95% limit of agreement for diastolic blood pressure during treadmill run was found at 30.50.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, E. M., Lim, E. A., Tan, W. H., Mustafa, W. A., Syed Idrus, S. Z., Mohd Nasir, N. F., … Mou Yusop, S. N. A. (2020). Comparative Study between Wearable Sensor and Cuff Arm Blood Pressure Meter in Measuring Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Monitor Using Statistical Approach. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1529). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/2/022082

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free