Primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients: Where do we stand?

26Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a frequent complication in ambulatory cancer patients. Despite the high risk, routine thromboprophylaxis is not recommended because of the high number needed to treat and the risk of bleeding. Two recent trials demonstrated that the number needed to treat can be reduced by selecting cancer patients at high risk for VTE with prediction scores, leading the latest guidelines to suggest such an approach in clinical practice. Yet, the interpretation of these trial results and the translation of the guideline recommendations to clinical practice may be less straightforward. In this clinically-oriented review, some of the controversies are addressed by focusing on the burden of VTE in cancer patients, discussing the performance of available risk assessment scores, and summarizing the findings of recent trials. This overview can help oncologists, hematologists, and vascular medicine specialists decide about thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mulder, F. I., Bosch, F. T. M., & van Es, N. (2020, February 1). Primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients: Where do we stand? Cancers. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12020367

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free