Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and induced hypertension improve spinal cord perfusion after acute spinal cord injury in pigs

47Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is commonly treated by elevating the mean arterial pressure (MAP). Other potential interventions include cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD). Objective: To determine the efficacy of aggressive MAP elevation combined with intrathecal pressure (ITP) reduction; our primary objective was to improve spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) after SCI. Methods: All 15 pigs underwent laminectomy. Study groups included control (n 3); SCI only (n 3); SCI combined with MAP elevation (SCI + MAP) (n 3); SCI combined with CSFD (SCI + CSFD) (n 3); and SCI combined with both MAP elevation and CSFD (SCI + MAP + CSFD) (n 3). SCBF was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry. Results: In the SCI group, SCBF decreased by 56% after SCI. MAP elevation after SCI resulted in a 34% decrease in SCBF, whereas CSFD resulted in a 59% decrease in SCBF. The combination of CSFD and MAP elevation resulted in a 24% increase in SCBF. The SCI + MAP group had an average ITP increase of 5.45 mm Hg after MAP elevation 1 hour after SCI and remained at that level throughout the experiment. Conclusion: Both MAP elevation alone and CSFD alone led to only short-term improvement of SCBF. The combination of MAP elevation and CSFD significantly and sustainably improved SCBF and spinal cord perfusion pressure. Although laser Doppler flowmetry can provide flow measurements to a tissue depth of only 1.5 mm, these results may represent pattern of blood flow changes in the entire spinal cord after injury.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martirosyan, N. L., Kalani, M. Y. S., Bichard, W. D., Baaj, A. A., Fernando Gonzalez, L., Preul, M. C., & Theodore, N. (2015). Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and induced hypertension improve spinal cord perfusion after acute spinal cord injury in pigs. Neurosurgery, 76(4), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000638

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free