Evaluation of pharmacoeconomic direct cost in diabetes patients

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major cause of disability, morbidity and mortality Worldwide. The objective of this study is to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic (PE) direct health-care cost in Type 2 diabetes with complications and diabetes alone: A cost of illness study. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted for 1 year at the care diabetes center, Warangal. The enrolled patients were followed and the information collected contains: Total direct costs, which include direct medical costs and direct nonmedical cost. The data observed was analyzed for the average cost incurred in treating the diabetic patient. Results: The total average costs per diabetic patient without complications was Rs. 8695.7±1341, this includes the average direct medical cost Rs. 6366.50±561.12, the average laboratory cost Rs. 1368.84±64.8, the average direct nonmedical cost was Rs. 960.36±14.04 compared to those with DM complications, the total average cost was Rs. 12960.73±549.96 for macrovascular complications, Rs. 11039.11±265.36 for microvascular complications. To treat diabetes with comorbidities which include both micro and macro complications the total average cost was Rs. 16658.13±1393.44, the average direct medical cost was Rs. 14071.77±2884.68, the average laboratory cost Rs. 1628.04±51, the average direct nonmedical cost was Rs. 958.32±13.08. The costs were found to increase progressively with the increase in the number of complications. Costs also vary significantly across the types of complications. Conclusion: Our study concludes that the cost of diabetes with complications resulted about 2 times higher than compared to diabetes alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sangam, K., Anifa, M., Swathi, K., Venkateswarlu, K., & Ram Mohan Reddy, T. (2017). Evaluation of pharmacoeconomic direct cost in diabetes patients. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 10(4), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i4.8510

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free