Early Stimulation and Enhanced Preschool: A Randomized Trial

7Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the impacts of 2 interventions, early stimulation (ES) for children aged <3 years and enhanced preschool (EP) for children aged 31 years, and their interactions. METHODS: In Odisha, India, 192 villages were randomly assigned to ES or to no ES. Within each village, about 8 mothers with children initially aged 7 to 16 months were enrolled, receiving ES or no ES accordingly (n 5 1449). Subsequently, when children were aged ∼3 years, the villages were rerandomized to either EP at Anganwadi centers or no EP. This yielded 4 groups: (1) ES and EP, (2) only ES, (3) only EP, and (4) no intervention. Trained Anganwadi workers ran the EP. Primary outcomes, measured at baseline and follow-up after ∼1 year, were children’s IQ (summarizing cognition, language, and executive functioning) and school readiness (SR). Secondary outcomes were home environments, caregivers’ child-development knowledge. and preschool quality. RESULTS: Fifteen months after ES ended, onlyES had a sustained benefit on IQ (0.18 SD, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meghir, C., Attanasio, O., Jervis, P., Day, M., Makkar, P., Behrman, J., … Grantham-McGregor, S. (2023). Early Stimulation and Enhanced Preschool: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics, 151. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-060221H

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free