Detecting clitics related orthographic errors in Turkish

7Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

For the spell correction task, vocabulary based methods have been replaced with methods that take morphological and grammar rules into account. However, such tools are fairly immature, and, worse, nonexistent for many low resource languages. Checking only if a word is well-formed with respect to the morphological rules of a language may produce false negatives due to the ambiguity resulting from the presence of numerous homophonic words. In this work, we propose an approach to detect and correct the “de/da” clitic errors in Turkish text. Our model is a neural sequence tagger trained with a synthetically constructed dataset consisting of positive and negative samples. The model's performance with this dataset is presented according to different word embedding configurations. The model achieved an F1 score of 86.67% on a synthetically constructed dataset. We also compared the model's performance on a manually curated dataset of challenging samples that proved superior to other spelling correctors with 71% accuracy compared to the second best (Google Docs) with 34% accuracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arıkan, U., Güngör, O., & Uskudarli, S. (2019). Detecting clitics related orthographic errors in Turkish. In International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP (Vol. 2019-September, pp. 71–76). Incoma Ltd. https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free