Effects of periosteal elevation before lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. Although osteotomy is an important part of rhinoplasty, it is known to be closely related to postoperative eyelid edema and ecchymosis.We aimed to evaluate the effects of periosteal elevation prior to osteotomy on eyelid edema and ecchymosis. Methods. Two authors reviewed studies in the Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases published through May 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing periosteal elevation (subperiosteal tunneling) with periosteal preservation that reported eyelid edema or ecchymosis or subconjunctival hemorrhage as outcomes of interest were included. From each study, the baseline characteristics of the study subjects, the quality of the study, the number of patients in the treatment and control groups, and outcomes were extracted. Results. Data for meta-analysis were identified in six studies with a total of 208 patients. Eyelid ecchymosis and edema within 3 days postoperatively were significantly more common in the periosteal elevation group than in the preservation group, although such an association was not found for edema on postoperative day 7 (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.09 to 0.50; I2 =0%). There was no significant difference in sub-conjunctival hemorrhage on day 1 (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI, –0.09 to 0.72; I2 =0%). Conclusion. Periosteal preservation during lateral osteotomy may reduce eyelid edema and ecchymosis compared to periosteal elevation. Further studies with rigorous research methods should be carried out to determine the effectiveness of different techniques in lateral osteotomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J. S., Kim, S. H., Lee, H., Kim, B. G., & Hwang, S. H. (2020). Effects of periosteal elevation before lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 13(3), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2019.01599

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free