Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: A single-institution experience and systematic literature review

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of LTG with open total gastrectomy (OTG) for RGC. Patients and Methods: Twentytwo patients who underwent total gastrectomy for RGC were enrolled in this study. Results: LTG was carried out in seven patients, and OTG was performed in the remaining 15 patients. The mean operation time in the LTG group was longer than that in the OTG group. The estimated blood loss in the LTG group was less than that in the OTG group. No cases in the LTG group required open conversion. Postoperatively, the first meal and defecation were earlier in the LTG group than in the OTG group. The overall survival rates of the two groups were comparable. Conclusion: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a feasible surgical option for RGC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ota, M., Ikebe, M., Shin, Y., Kagawa, M., Mano, Y., Nakanoko, T., … Toh, Y. (2020, August 1). Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: A single-institution experience and systematic literature review. In Vivo. International Institute of Anticancer Research. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11996

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free