On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2003

81Citations
Citations of this article
196Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Some of the problems that rendered Excel 97, Excel 2000 and Excel 2002 unfit for use as a statistical package have been fixed in Excel 2003, though some have not. Additionally, in fixing some errors, Microsoft introduced other errors. Excel's new and improved random number generator, at default, is supposed to produce uniform numbers on the interval (0,1); but it also produces negative numbers. Excel 2003 is an improvement over previous versions, but not enough has been done that its use for statistical purposes can be recommended. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McCullough, B. D., & Wilson, B. (2005). On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2003. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 49(4), 1244–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.06.016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free