Abstract
This paper is a step toward showing what is achievable using non-classical metatheory—particularly, a substructural paraconsistent framework. What standard results, or analogues thereof, from the classical metatheory of first order logic(s) can be obtained? We reconstruct some of the originals proofs for Completeness, Löwenheim-Skolem and Compactness theorems in the context of a substructural logic with the naive comprehension schema. The main result is that paraconsistent metatheory can ‘re-capture’ versions of standard theorems, given suitable restrictions and background assumptions; but the shift to non-classical logic may recast the meanings of these apparently ‘absolute’ theorems.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Badia, G., Weber, Z., & Girard, P. (2022). Paraconsistent Metatheory: New Proofs with Old Tools. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 51(4), 825–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-022-09651-x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.