A regression analysis of the Waterlow score in pressure ulcer risk assessment

19Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To explore the predictive value of the Waterlow score, and the subscores of age and gender. Design: Logistic regression analysis was conducted on the two subscores of the Waterlow score, and the residual Waterlow score with gender and age removed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis gave a quantitative measure of the classification ability of the Waterlow score. Setting: Burton, UK. Subjects: All admissions over a five-year period to the District General Hospital, a total of 150 015 admissions of 82 691 patients. Interventions: None. Main outcome measures: Area under the ROC curve for significant (as determined by logistic regression) variables. Results: Data were inaccurate in at least 44.7% of the records, and analysis was conducted on the 43 735 records for which no errors were apparent. Nine hundred and fifty-four patients had a pressure ulcer on admission (2.1%); 277 developed a pressure ulcer (0.6%). The Waterlow score was predictive of pressure ulcers. Age was predictive, and gender was not found to be a significant predictor. Conclusions: The Waterlow score may be improved and simplified by removing gender from the scoring system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anthony, D., Reynolds, T., & Russell, L. (2003). A regression analysis of the Waterlow score in pressure ulcer risk assessment. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17(2), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr603oa

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free