Analysis of Mechanical Failure Using the GAP Score After Surgery With Lateral and Posterior Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity

10Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score and mechanical failure (MF) following corrective fusion surgery with planned 2-stage surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Methods: Fifty-four patients (2 men, 52 females, aged 70.3 years) were included. MF, proximal junctional failure (PJF), and rod breakage (RB) occurred in 46.3% (25/54), 22.2% (12/54), and 29.6% (16/54) of patients, respectively. The immediate postoperative GAP scores were compared between patients with MF and without MF (MF+ and MF-, respectively). GAP scores in groups with and without PJF or RB were also compared. Results: Patients were grouped according to the GAP score for spinopelvic alignment: 23 (42.6%) as proportioned, 22 (40.7%) as moderately disproportioned, and 9 (16.7%) as severely disproportioned. The pre- and postoperative spinopelvic parameters did not differ significantly between the MF- and MF+ groups except pelvic incidence. Postoperatively, the mean pelvic incidence—lumbar lordosis changed to <10° in both groups. The GAP score and 3 categories of GAP scores did not differ significantly between the PJF- and PJF+ groups or between the RB+ and RB- groups. Conclusion: Multiple factors can cause PJF and RB, and the patient’s background may affect the ability to use the GAP score to predict MF. Further research may be needed in the future using modified GAP scores with additional factors in ASD patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hiyama, A., Katoh, H., Sakai, D., & Watanabe, M. (2023). Analysis of Mechanical Failure Using the GAP Score After Surgery With Lateral and Posterior Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity. Global Spine Journal, 13(8), 2488–2496. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221088802

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free