Methods to Compensate the Time Walk Errors in Timing Measurements for PET Detectors

9Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We investigate the effects of the signal walk-in timing measurements and the methods to compensate for the error when leading-edge discriminator (LED) triggering was used. Three pairs of crystals (LaBr3 cubes, lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) cubes, and LYSO rectangular prisms) were tested for coincidence timing resolution (CTR) to evaluate four compensation methods: 1) Linear 1-D; 2) Logarithm 1-D; 3) Polynomial 2-D; and 4) artificial neural network (ANN) 2-D. The experimental results show that: 1) the signal walk causes a logarithmic relationship between energy and measured time; 2) the signal walk dramatically affects the timing measurement at a wide energy window. The measured FWHM CTR decreased by 86.2%, from 670 ps to 92.7 ps, when the lower cut of the energy window was used; and 3) the Logarithm 1-D compensation can improve the timing performance. The FWHM CTRs decreased by 69.9%(from 326.8 ps to 101.3 ps) with an energy window of [300 keV-550 keV] and by 12.5%(from 97.2 ps to 85.1 ps) with an energy window of [410 keV-550 keV] for LaBr3 cube crystals. The results show that the Logarithm 1-D, Polynomial 2-D, and ANN 2-D compensations work well, achieving at least a 10%improvement in timing performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xie, S., Zhang, X., Huang, Q., Gong, Z., Xu, J., & Peng, Q. (2020). Methods to Compensate the Time Walk Errors in Timing Measurements for PET Detectors. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, 4(5), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2020.2981388

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free