Diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools: Mobile testing without a sound-treated environment

40Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To validate diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools without a sound-treated environment using an audiometer that incorporates insert earphones covered by circumaural earcups and real-time environmental noise monitoring. Research Design: A within-subject repeated measures design was employed to compare air (250 to 8000 Hz) and bone (250 to 4000 Hz) conduction pure-tone thresholds measured in natural school environments with thresholds measured in a sound-treated booth. Study Sample: 149 children (54% female) with an average age of 6.9 yr (SD 5 0.6; range 5 5-8). Results: Average difference between the booth and natural environment thresholds was 0.0 dB (SD 5 3.6) for air conduction and 0.1 dB (SD 5 3.1) for bone conduction. Average absolute difference between the booth and natural environment was 2.1 dB (SD 5 2.9) for air conduction and 1.6 dB (SD 5 2.7) for bone conduction. Almost all air- (96%) and bone-conduction (97%) threshold comparisons between the natural and booth test environments were within 0 to 5 dB. No statistically significant differences between thresholds recorded in the natural and booth environments for air- and bone-conduction audiometry were found (p > 0.01). Conclusions: Diagnostic air- and bone-conduction audiometry in schools, without a sound-treated room, is possible with sufficient earphone attenuation and real-time monitoring of environmental noise. Audiological diagnosis on-site for school screening may address concerns of false-positive referrals and poor follow-up compliance and allow for direct referral to audiological and/or medical intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Swanepoel, W., Maclennan-Smith, F., & Hall, J. W. (2013). Diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools: Mobile testing without a sound-treated environment. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(10), 992–1000. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.24.10.10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free