A survey of community pharmacists on prevention of HIV and hepatitis B and C: Current practice and attitudes in Grampian

31Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Prevention of infection with the blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) HIV and hepatitis B and C remains a major public health challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the activity, knowledge and attitudes of community pharmacists in Grampian in prevention of HIV and hepatitis B and C. Method: A questionnaire survey of community pharmacies was carried out in Grampian, a mixed urban-rural Health Board area in NE Scotland with a population of 532 432. Results: Ninety-nine out of 128 (77 per cent) community pharmacies responded. Many pharmacies were providing services for drug misusers. Nearly all pharmacies stocked condoms, 57 pharmacists stated that they stocked extra-strong condoms, and two stocked dental dams. Two-thirds had leaflets relating to safer sex, HIV or hepatitis. Less than half stated that they had lists of local agencies dealing with drug-related or sexual health problems. Knowledge of the BBPs, and confidence in giving advice, were greater for HIV than for hepatitis B and C. Few were aware of recommendations for hepatitis B vaccination. The majority felt that in the future pharmacists could have a greater role in prevention of these infections. Principal barriers to preventive activity were described as time pressure, lack of a private area and lack of training. Conclusions: There is untapped potential for community pharmacists to be a focus for advice and information relating to prevention of HIV and hepatitis B and C; however, resources are needed to address the current barriers identified.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watson, L., Bond, C., & Gault, C. (2003). A survey of community pharmacists on prevention of HIV and hepatitis B and C: Current practice and attitudes in Grampian. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 25(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free