Regional anesthesia/analgesia and the risk of cancer recurrence and mortality after prostatectomy: a meta-analysis

47Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

AIMS: To determine whether the use neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia is associated with longer biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and overall survival (OS) after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: The HR for BRFS was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.91-1.15) for all studies and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.91-1.15) for those that included propensity score matching. For OS, the HR across all studies was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.7-1.15) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68-0.96; p = 0.016) for those reporting propensity score matching. CONCLUSION: The anesthetic technique used during oncologic prostatectomy surgery is not associated with longer BRFS. By contrast, the use of regional analgesia appears to improve OS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, B. M., Singh Ghotra, V., Karam, J. A., Hernandez, M., Pratt, G., & Cata, J. P. (2015). Regional anesthesia/analgesia and the risk of cancer recurrence and mortality after prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. Pain Management, 5(5), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt.15.30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free