Grappling with Diversity in Research Through Design

  • Boon B
  • Baha E
  • Singh A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since its introduction, Research through Design (RtD) has taken on a wide variety of forms. Currently, there is a lack of clarity about what connects and separates different RtD approaches. Several attempts have been made to clarify these matters, often in the form of a top-down categorization. Here we start on a different path, one that is open for different points of view and grounded in the ongoing concerns and needs of RtD practitioners. Over two months, we engaged a local research community in weekly discussions about RtD in their work. Thoughts and questions were posted on a dedicated wall-space, maintained, and clustered over the weeks. As a result, we identified 11 themes that indicate concerns among participants about RtD. We suggest the themes can help in articulating different RtD ‘styles’ and ‘genres’, and believe this should be a collaborative and bottom-up effort that crosses disciplinary and institutional boundaries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boon, B., Baha, E., Singh, A., Wegener, F. E., Rozendaal, M. C., & Stappers, P. J. (2020). Grappling with Diversity in Research Through Design. In DRS2020: Synergy. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.362

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free