Modelling the density and mass of the Milky Way’s proto-galaxy components with APOGEE-Gaia

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Unravelling galaxy formation theory requires understanding galaxies both at high and low redshifts. A possible way to connect both realms is by studying the oldest stars in the Milky Way (i.e. the proto-Galaxy). We use the APOGEE-Gaia surveys to perform a purely chemical dissection of Milky Way (MW) stellar populations, and identify samples of stars likely belonging to proto-Galactic fragments. The metallicity dependence of the distribution of old MW stars in the [Mg/Mn]–[Al/Fe] enables the distinction of at least two populations in terms of their star formation histories: a rapidly evolved population likely associated with the main progenitor system of the proto-MW; and populations characterized by less efficient, slower, star formation. In the Solar neighbourhood less efficient star forming populations are dominated by the Gaia-Enceladus/Sausage accretion debris. In the inner Galaxy, they are largely associated with the Heracles structure. We model the density of chemically defined proto-Galaxy populations, finding that they are well represented by a Plummer model with a scale radius of a ∼ 3.5 kpc, and an oblate ellipsoid with flattening parameters [p ∼ 0.8; q ∼ 0.6]; this finding indicates that the MW plausibly hosts a low-mass, metal-poor, bulge component. We integrate this density for chemically unevolved stars between −2 < −0.5 to obtain a minimum stellar mass for the proto-Galaxy of M∗(r < 10 kpc) = 9.1 ± 0.2 × 108 M. Our results suggest the proto-Milky Way is at least comprised of two significant fragments: the main in situ progenitor and the Heracles structure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horta, D., & Schiavon, R. P. (2025). Modelling the density and mass of the Milky Way’s proto-galaxy components with APOGEE-Gaia. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 537(4), 3730–3745. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free