Comparison of TMA Technique and Routine Whole Slide Analysis in Evaluation of Proliferative Markers Expression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Cancer

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Comparison of the expression of Ki-67, MCM3, 5, 7 and MTI/II proteins using immunohistochemistry (IHC) on whole section (WS) and tissue microarray (TMA) of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) samples. Materials and Methods: A total of 51 archival paraffin blocks of LSCC were used. TMAs were prepared from 1.5 mm core punches. IHC reactions were performed using antibodies against Ki-67, minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCM3, 5, 7) and metallothionein (MTI/II). Results: Spearman rank correlation test revealed moderate positive correlation in the case of Ki-67: WS vs. TMA (r=0.38, p=0.07) and strong positive correlation in regard to the rest of tested markers: MCM3, WS vs. TMA (r=0.49, p=0.0004); MCM5, WS vs. TMA (r=0.61, p<0.0001); MCM7, WS vs. TMA (r=0.59, p<0.0001); MTI/II, WS vs. TMA (r=0.66, p<0.0001). Mann Whitney U-test showed no significant differences in the case of Ki-67 and MCM5. Moreover, Bland-Altman test showed a low level of bias in regard to Ki-67, WS vs. TMA and MCM5, WS vs. TMA. Conclusion: TMA may be an effective and reliable method of assessment of Ki-67 and MCM5 expression in LSCC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ciesielska, U., Piotrowska, A., Kobierzycki, C., Pastuszewski, W., Podhorska-Okolow, M., Dziegiel, P., & Nowinska, K. (2020). Comparison of TMA Technique and Routine Whole Slide Analysis in Evaluation of Proliferative Markers Expression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Cancer. In Vivo, 34(6), 3263–3270. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12163

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free