Reply to letter to editor by Hadigal et al. regarding the immunogenicity and safety trial of high-dose influenza vaccine in adults aged ≥60 years

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Hadigal et al. argued the recommendation of high-dose influenza vaccine over standard-dose formulation is not supported by comparisons of numbers-needed-to-vaccinate (NNV) nor aligned with the WHO mandate of improving vaccine coverage. However, the authors’ NNV calculation was inaccurate. A preferential recommendation for vaccines preventing influenza/complications can increase coverage. Furthermore, the impact of vaccination is a function of efficacy/effectiveness and the vaccine-preventable fraction of disease burden; therefore Hadigal et al. should interpret the absolute risk reduction by vaccination within the context of overall disease burden. To address the threat of COVID-19 pandemic, authorities should implement concomitant influenza/COVID-19 vaccination to reduce the burden of cocirculation of influenza and SARS- CoV- 2 viruses and increase the coverage of proven influenza vaccines as per WHO mandate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yin, J. K., Pepin, S., van Aalst, R., Loiacono, M. M., & Samson, S. I. (2022). Reply to letter to editor by Hadigal et al. regarding the immunogenicity and safety trial of high-dose influenza vaccine in adults aged ≥60 years. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2106749

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free