Abstract
Two in-line oxygen saturation monitors, the CDI 100 and OxySat II, were evaluated in the clinical setting. Eighty-seven venous blood samples were drawn during 20 elective cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. Monitor readings were compared to OSM III co-oximeter values. The results revealed that saturation(%) determination was biased, -3.16 ± 2.21 SD for the CDI 100 and -0.34 ± 2.17 SD for the OxySat II. Hemoglobin (g/dl) and hematocrit (%) measurement, available only for the CDI 100, resulted in a bias of +5.54 ± 5.68 SD and +1.94 ± 1.78 SD, respectively. It was concluded that both monitors operated within clinically acceptable limits, with a more favorable outcome for the OxySat II.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Appelblad, M., Svenmarker, S., Häggmark, S., Jansson, E., & Lindholm, R. (1994). Continuous Venous Oximetry: A Comparative Study Between the CDI 100 and the Bentley OxySat II. Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology, 26(4), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/1994264185
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.