Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine. or even mandatory?

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hospital-onset sepsis accounts for 10%-15% of all sepsis cases and is associated with very high mortality rates, yet to date most hospitals have paid little attention to tracking its incidence and outcomes. This contrasts sharply with the substantial effort that hospitals and regulatory agencies spend tracking and reporting a limited subset of healthcare-associated infections. The recent development of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event (ASE) definition, however, provides a validated and standardized mechanism for facilities to identify patients with nosocomial sepsis using routinely available electronic health record data. Recent data have demonstrated that hospital-onset ASE surveillance identifies many infections that are largely missed by current reportable healthcare-associated infections and that are associated with much higher mortality rates. Expanding the breadth of surveillance to include these highly consequential infections could help identify new targets for prevention and quality improvement and ultimately catalyze better outcomes for hospitalized patients. More work is needed, however, to characterize the preventability of hospital-onset ASE, develop and validate robust case-mix adjustment tools, and facilitate widespread uptake in hospitals with limited resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rhee, C., & Klompas, M. (2022, February 28). Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine. or even mandatory? Antimicrobial Stewardship and Healthcare Epidemiology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free