Effects of minocycline on motor function recovery and expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and brain-derived neurotrophic factor after spinal cord injury in rats

11Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Study explore the effects of minocycline on the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and brain-derived neurotrophic factor after spinal cord injury and its possible mechanism of action. Methods: The model of acute spinal cord injury was established by Allen's method. The rats in each group were assessed with Basso Beattie Bresnahan score of hindlimb motor function and inclined plate test score. Serum malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase, glial fibrillary acidic protein and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in spinal cord were compared. Key findings: Basso Beattie Bresnahan scores, Tiltboard experiment max angles, and Serum superoxide dismutase activity of the minocycline group were higher than those of the model group after surgery (P < 0.05). Serum malondialdehyde content, and expression of the minocycline group was lower than that of the model group (P < 0.05), and brain-derived neurotrophic factorexpression of minocycline group was significantly higher in the model group after surgery (P < 0.05). Minocycline can promote the recovery of motor function after spinal cord injury in rats. Conclusions: The mechanism of action may be that it inhibits local free radical generation, reduces lipid peroxidation and glial fibrillary acidic protein expression in spinal cord tissue after spinal cord injury, and promotes the synthesis of endogenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor, thus improving the microenvironment of spinal cord regeneration after spinal cord injury in rats.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, J., Ji, J., Wang, Z., & Xu, T. (2021). Effects of minocycline on motor function recovery and expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and brain-derived neurotrophic factor after spinal cord injury in rats. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 73(3), 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpp/rgaa041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free