Desempenho comunicativo de crianças com síndrome de Down em duas situações diferentes

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: analysis of the pragmatic aspects of language in children with Down syndrome. Aim: to verify the influence of environmental and contextual variables in the pragmatic aspects of language of Down syndrome (DS) children when interacting with their caregivers and therapist, and to compare their performance in both situations. Method: participants were 15 children with DS with ages ranging from 4 to 6.11 years. Data were obtained through anamnesis, the protocol of functional communicative profile, and a socioeconomic questionnaire. Data obtained from both interaction situations (with the caregiver and with the therapist) were compared, and submitted to statistical analysis. Results: Caregiver's socioeconomic and educational levels were the variables that most had an influence on the pragmatic aspects of the child in both interaction situations. Children presented proportional rates of functional communication when compared to the data obtained for their caregivers and the communicative functions more frequently used by them were recognition of others, comment and performative. Comparisons between the interaction situations indicated no statistically significant differences concerning the children's communicative performance. Conclusion: caregivers' socioeconomic and educational levels might be considered risk factors for the development of the pragmatic aspects of language in children with DS and special attention should be given to these families during the speech-language therapeutic process. Independently of the interlocutor, these children were able to initiate and maintain communication, using communicative means and functions in a similar fashion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Porto-Cunha, E., & Limongi, S. C. O. (2010). Desempenho comunicativo de crianças com síndrome de Down em duas situações diferentes. Pro-Fono, 22(3), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872010000300016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free