REINFORCEMENT DELAY: SOME EFFECTS ON BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST 1

  • Richards R
18Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Thirty five White Carneaux pigeons first received 20 sessions of non‐delayed reinforcement according to a multiple variable‐interval 1‐min variable‐interval 1‐min schedule. For the remaining 15 sessions, subjects were assigned to one of five groups, with seven subjects per group. Four of these groups involved reinforcement according to the same multiple schedule as before, but reinforcement during one of the components was delayed for either 2.5, 5, 10, or 120 sec. The schedule for the fifth group was changed to multiple variable‐interval 1‐min extinction schedule of reinforcement. While some subjects in all groups showed behavioral contrast, it occurred more consistently in the groups involving extinction or the longer delays of reinforcement. Groups involving the various durations of delayed reinforcement or even extinction during the altered component did not, however, show a statistically significant difference in the amount of behavioral contrast. It was suggested that neither a reduction in reinforcement frequency nor response rate during the altered component is necessary to the production of behavioral contrast.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richards, R. W. (1972). REINFORCEMENT DELAY: SOME EFFECTS ON BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST 1. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1972.17-381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free