Human capital versus sorting: The effects of compulsory attendance laws

102Citations
Citations of this article
106Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Under the educational sorting hypothesis a state compulsory school attendance law will increase the educational attainment of high-ability workers who are not directly affected by the law. Under the human capital hypothesis such laws affect only those individuals whose behavior is directly constrained. We find that compulsory attendance laws do increase enrollment rates in age groups they do not affect directly. Thus, our results contradict the human capital hypothesis and are consistent with the sorting hypothesis. © 1986, President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lang, K., & Kropp, D. (1986). Human capital versus sorting: The effects of compulsory attendance laws. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(3), 609–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885699

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free