Are Arabic and Verbal Numbers Processed in Different Ways?

62Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted in order to examine effects of notation-Arabic and verbal numbers-on relevant and irrelevant numerical processing. In Experiment 1, notation interacted with the numerical distance effect, and irrelevant physical size affected numerical processing (i.e., size congruity effect) for both notations but to a lesser degree for verbal numbers. In contrast, size congruity had no effect when verbal numbers were the irrelevant dimension. In Experiments 2 and 3, different parameters that could possibly affect the results, such as discriminability and variability (Experiment 2) and the block design (Experiment 3), were controlled. The results replicated the effects obtained in Experiment 1. In Experiment 4, in which physical size was made more difficult to process, size congruity for irrelevant verbal numbers was observed. The present results imply that notation affects numerical processing and that Arabic and verbal numbers are represented separately, and thus it is suggested that current models of numerical processing should have separate comparison mechanisms for verbal and Arabic numbers. © 2008 American Psychological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kadosh, R. C., Henik, A., & Rubinsten, O. (2008). Are Arabic and Verbal Numbers Processed in Different Ways? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34(6), 1377–1391. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013413

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free