Innovation and optimal punishment, with antitrust applications

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article modifies the optimal punishment analysis by incorporating investment incentives with external benefits. In the models examined, the recommendation that the optimal penalty should internalize the marginal social harm is no longer valid. We focus on antitrust applications. In light of the benefits from innovation, the optimal policy will punish monopolizing firms more leniently than suggested in the standard static model. It may be optimal not to punish the monopolizing firm at all, or to reward the firm rather than punish it. We examine the precise balance between penalty and reward in the optimal punishment scheme. © The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hylton, K. N., & Lin, H. (2014). Innovation and optimal punishment, with antitrust applications. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free